Background Jobs & Workflows

Inngest vs Trigger.dev: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between Inngest and Trigger.dev? Both are popular background jobs & workflows tools. Below we compare them on pricing, free tiers, features, and pros & cons so you can pick the right fit for your stack.

Quick verdict

Both are solid background jobs & workflows options. Trigger.dev is cheaper to start, but the right choice depends on the specific features and integrations you need.

Inngest vs Trigger.dev — Side by Side

InngestTrigger.dev
CategoryBackground Jobs & WorkflowsBackground Jobs & Workflows
PricingFree · paid from $75/moFree · paid from $50/mo
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Free tier
Rating4.64.6
Best forBackground Jobs & Workflows — workflows, durable-executionBackground Jobs & Workflows — workflows, open-source

Pros & Cons

  • No infrastructure to run
  • Durable multi-step workflows
  • Event-driven + cron in one model
  • Great local dev experience
  • Execution-based pricing can add up at scale
  • Newer ecosystem than Celery/Sidekiq
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Write jobs in plain TypeScript
  • No execution timeouts
  • Strong AI-agent/workflow tooling
  • TypeScript/Node only
  • Self-hosting adds operational work

Key Features Compared

Inngest

  • 50K executions/mo
  • Unlimited functions
  • Automatic retries & step state
  • Local dev server

Trigger.dev

  • 10K runs/mo
  • 14-day run history
  • No task timeouts
  • Open-source / self-hostable

Choose Inngest if…

  • You want a free tier to validate before paying.
  • No infrastructure to run
  • Durable multi-step workflows
  • Event-driven + cron in one model
Inngest review & pricing

Choose Trigger.dev if…

  • You want a free tier to validate before paying.
  • Budget is tight — paid plans start lower ($50/mo vs $75/mo).
  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Write jobs in plain TypeScript
Trigger.dev review & pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Inngest better than Trigger.dev?

Both are solid background jobs & workflows options. Trigger.dev is cheaper to start, but the right choice depends on the specific features and integrations you need.

What is the difference between Inngest and Trigger.dev?

Inngest — Durable, event-driven functions and workflows for TypeScript & Python — no queues or workers to manage. Trigger.dev — Open-source background jobs and AI workflows for TypeScript — long-running tasks with no timeouts. Both are background jobs & workflows tools; the comparison table above breaks down pricing, free tiers, and what each is best for.

Inngest vs Trigger.dev: which is cheaper?

Inngest pricing: Free · paid from $75/mo. Trigger.dev pricing: Free · paid from $50/mo. Confirm current pricing on each tool's official site, as plans change.

Which is rated higher, Inngest or Trigger.dev?

In our catalog, Inngest rates 4.6 out of 5 and Trigger.dev rates 4.6 out of 5 — they are evenly matched.

See more options in our guide to the best background jobs & workflows tools for startups.

Still not sure which to pick?

Get a free, AI-powered tech stack — including the best background jobs & workflows pick for your budget and team — in 60 seconds.

Build my stack free