Background Jobs & Workflows

Hatchet vs Inngest: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between Hatchet and Inngest? Both are popular background jobs & workflows tools. Below we compare them on pricing, free tiers, features, and pros & cons so you can pick the right fit for your stack.

Quick verdict

Both Hatchet and Inngest are strong background jobs & workflows choices. The right pick comes down to your specific feature needs, existing stack, and team preferences.

Hatchet vs Inngest — Side by Side

HatchetInngest
CategoryBackground Jobs & WorkflowsBackground Jobs & Workflows
PricingFreeFree · paid from $75/mo
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Free tier
Rating4.44.6
Best forBackground Jobs & Workflows — workflows, postgresBackground Jobs & Workflows — workflows, durable-execution

Pros & Cons

  • Simple Postgres-based architecture
  • Easy to self-host
  • Great for AI task orchestration
  • Fine-grained concurrency control
  • Younger project, smaller community
  • Fewer integrations than incumbents
  • No infrastructure to run
  • Durable multi-step workflows
  • Event-driven + cron in one model
  • Great local dev experience
  • Execution-based pricing can add up at scale
  • Newer ecosystem than Celery/Sidekiq

Key Features Compared

Hatchet

  • Postgres-backed durability
  • Easy self-hosting
  • Concurrency & rate limiting
  • Built-in dashboard

Inngest

  • 50K executions/mo
  • Unlimited functions
  • Automatic retries & step state
  • Local dev server

Choose Hatchet if…

  • You want a free tier to validate before paying.
  • Simple Postgres-based architecture
  • Easy to self-host
  • Great for AI task orchestration
Hatchet review & pricing

Choose Inngest if…

  • You want a free tier to validate before paying.
  • No infrastructure to run
  • Durable multi-step workflows
  • Event-driven + cron in one model
Inngest review & pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Hatchet better than Inngest?

Both Hatchet and Inngest are strong background jobs & workflows choices. The right pick comes down to your specific feature needs, existing stack, and team preferences.

What is the difference between Hatchet and Inngest?

Hatchet — Postgres-backed orchestration engine for background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows. Inngest — Durable, event-driven functions and workflows for TypeScript & Python — no queues or workers to manage. Both are background jobs & workflows tools; the comparison table above breaks down pricing, free tiers, and what each is best for.

Hatchet vs Inngest: which is cheaper?

Hatchet pricing: Free. Inngest pricing: Free · paid from $75/mo. Confirm current pricing on each tool's official site, as plans change.

Which is rated higher, Hatchet or Inngest?

In our catalog, Hatchet rates 4.4 out of 5 and Inngest rates 4.6 out of 5, so Inngest has a slight edge on reviews.

See more options in our guide to the best background jobs & workflows tools for startups.

Still not sure which to pick?

Get a free, AI-powered tech stack — including the best background jobs & workflows pick for your budget and team — in 60 seconds.

Build my stack free