GitHub Actions vs Jenkins: Which is Better in 2026?

Name: App Stack Builder
Availability: InStock

CI/CD

GitHub Actions and Jenkins are both CI/CD tools, made for different people. GitHub Actions is for teams whose code lives on GitHub and who want CI/CD in the same place, with free minutes to start. Jenkins is for teams that want full control of an open-source CI server and have people to run it.

Quick verdict

There’s no single winner; pick on your constraint. Choose GitHub Actions if your repositories are on GitHub. Choose Jenkins if you need CI inside a network that can’t reach hosted services.

GitHub Actions vs Jenkins: Side by Side

	GitHub Actions	Jenkins
Category	CI/CD	CI/CD
What it is	CI/CD built into GitHub	Open-source automation server
Where jobs run	GitHub-hosted or self-hosted runners	Your servers
Free access	$12 of compute a month; public repos free	Free
How you pay	Per runner-minute beyond the included amount	Free; you pay for the machines
Self-hosting	Self-hosted runners, free	Self-hosted only
Pricing	Free · paid from $4/user/mo	Free
Starting price	Free tier available	Free tier available
Free tier
Best for	CI/CD: GitHub, marketplace actions, free for public repos	CI/CD: self-hosted, plugins, open source

Pros & Cons

GitHub Actions

Built into GitHub repositories
Free on public repos with standard runners
Large marketplace of actions
Self-hosted runners don’t use the allowance

macOS minutes cost $0.062 each
Small included compute on Free
Workflow YAML gets complex

Jenkins

Infinitely extensible
No vendor lock-in
Free
Mature & proven

You manage the infrastructure
Dated UX vs modern CI

Key Features Compared

GitHub Actions

Included compute each month is a dollar amount: $12 on Free (about 2,000 Linux minutes), $18 on Pro and Team, $300 on Enterprise Cloud
Linux 2-core $0.006 a minute, Windows $0.010, macOS $0.062; Linux 1-core $0.002
Standard runners on public repositories are free and don’t use the allowance
Self-hosted runners don’t use included compute
GitHub Team is $4 a user a month; Enterprise $21

Jenkins

Open-source automation server, free to self-host
2,300+ community plugins
Supported by the Continuous Delivery Foundation
Runs any language or stack on your own machines

Choose GitHub Actions if…

Your repositories are on GitHub.
You want a large marketplace of ready-made actions.
You run open-source projects that get free minutes.

GitHub Actions review & pricing

Choose Jenkins if…

You need CI inside a network that can’t reach hosted services.
You want a plugin for almost any tool.
You have engineers to maintain the server and plugins.

Jenkins review & pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GitHub Actions better than Jenkins?⌄

There’s no single winner; pick on your constraint. Choose GitHub Actions if your repositories are on GitHub. Choose Jenkins if you need CI inside a network that can’t reach hosted services.

What is the difference between GitHub Actions and Jenkins?⌄

What it is. GitHub Actions: CI/CD built into GitHub. Jenkins: Open-source automation server. Where jobs run. GitHub Actions: GitHub-hosted or self-hosted runners. Jenkins: Your servers. Free access. GitHub Actions: $12 of compute a month; public repos free. Jenkins: Free. How you pay. GitHub Actions: Per runner-minute beyond the included amount. Jenkins: Free; you pay for the machines. Self-hosting. GitHub Actions: Self-hosted runners, free. Jenkins: Self-hosted only.

GitHub Actions vs Jenkins: which is cheaper?⌄

GitHub Actions pricing: Free · paid from $4/user/mo. Jenkins pricing: Free. Confirm current pricing on each tool's official site, as plans change.

When should I skip both GitHub Actions and Jenkins?⌄

Skip GitHub Actions if your Docker builds are slow. Depot runs them on faster machines with a shared cache. Skip Jenkins if you want nothing to run. GitHub Actions or CircleCI are hosted.

Sources · tool facts checked November 2026