AWS EventBridge vs Inngest: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between AWS EventBridge and Inngest? Both are popular background jobs & workflows tools. Below we compare them on pricing, free tiers, features, and pros & cons so you can pick the right fit for your stack.
AWS EventBridge is for: Teams on AWS who need scheduled tasks and event routing between AWS services and SaaS apps.
Inngest is for: TypeScript, Python and Go teams who want durable multi-step functions and event-driven jobs without running queue infrastructure.
Quick verdict
There’s no single winner; pick on your constraint. Choose AWS EventBridge if your stack runs on AWS and you need cron-style schedules for Lambda or other AWS targets. Choose Inngest if you want multi-step functions where each step retries and keeps its state, without running queues or workers.
AWS EventBridge vs Inngest — Side by Side
| AWS EventBridge | Inngest | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Background Jobs & Workflows | Background Jobs & Workflows |
| What it is | Managed event bus and scheduler | Hosted durable workflow platform |
| Languages | Any (AWS SDKs and API) | TypeScript, Python, Go, Kotlin |
| What it runs on | AWS | Inngest Cloud or self-hosted; steps run in your app |
| How you pay | Per million events or invocations | Monthly plan plus per-execution overage |
| Free access | 14M scheduler invocations a month | 50,000 executions a month |
| Pricing | Free · then usage-based | Free · paid from $99/mo |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Free tier | ||
| Rating | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Best for | Background Jobs & Workflows — AWS, event routing, scheduling | Background Jobs & Workflows — durable functions, event-driven jobs, serverless apps |
Pros & Cons
- Deep AWS integration
- Truly serverless and scalable
- Generous scheduler free tier
- Cron + event routing in one
- AWS lock-in
- Pricing has many components
- Not a general-purpose worker/queue
- No infrastructure to run
- Durable multi-step workflows
- Event-driven + cron in one model
- Great local dev experience
- Execution-based pricing can add up at scale
- Newer ecosystem than Celery/Sidekiq
Key Features Compared
AWS EventBridge
- Scheduler: 14 million invocations a month free, then $1.00 per million
- Custom and partner events on classic buses: $1.00 per million
- AWS management events ingested at no charge
- Pipes: $0.40 per million requests, billed in 64 KB chunks
- API destinations: $0.20 per million events plus data transfer
- Archive and replay: $0.10 per GB processed and $0.023 per GB a month stored
Inngest
- Free: 50,000 executions a month, 5 concurrent steps, 5 seats and 24-hour trace history; work pauses at the quota
- Pro from $99 a month with 1M executions, 100 concurrent steps and 7-day trace history
- Pro overage: $50 per extra 1M executions
- Business from $499 a month with 10M executions and 14-day trace history; Enterprise custom
- Self-hosting supported since the 1.0 release, on SQLite by default or your own Postgres and Redis
- SDKs for TypeScript, Python, Go and Kotlin
Choose AWS EventBridge if…
- Your stack runs on AWS and you need cron-style schedules for Lambda or other AWS targets.
- You route events between AWS services, SaaS partners and your own apps.
- You run many schedules and want 14 million free invocations a month.
Choose Inngest if…
- You want multi-step functions where each step retries and keeps its state, without running queues or workers.
- You trigger background work from events and cron schedules in the same codebase.
- You deploy to serverless platforms and want jobs to run inside your existing app.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AWS EventBridge better than Inngest?⌄
There’s no single winner; pick on your constraint. Choose AWS EventBridge if your stack runs on AWS and you need cron-style schedules for Lambda or other AWS targets. Choose Inngest if you want multi-step functions where each step retries and keeps its state, without running queues or workers.
What is the difference between AWS EventBridge and Inngest?⌄
What it is — AWS EventBridge: Managed event bus and scheduler. Inngest: Hosted durable workflow platform. Languages — AWS EventBridge: Any (AWS SDKs and API). Inngest: TypeScript, Python, Go, Kotlin. What it runs on — AWS EventBridge: AWS. Inngest: Inngest Cloud or self-hosted; steps run in your app. How you pay — AWS EventBridge: Per million events or invocations. Inngest: Monthly plan plus per-execution overage. Free access — AWS EventBridge: 14M scheduler invocations a month. Inngest: 50,000 executions a month.
AWS EventBridge vs Inngest: which is cheaper?⌄
AWS EventBridge pricing: Free · then usage-based. Inngest pricing: Free · paid from $99/mo. Confirm current pricing on each tool's official site, as plans change.
Which is rated higher, AWS EventBridge or Inngest?⌄
In our catalog, AWS EventBridge rates 4.2 out of 5 and Inngest rates 4.6 out of 5, so Inngest has a slight edge on reviews.
When should I skip both AWS EventBridge and Inngest?⌄
Skip AWS EventBridge if you need a worker queue with job retries and step state. Inngest or Temporal handle that. Skip Inngest if your jobs are simple and you already run Redis. BullMQ runs on your own Redis with no per-execution bill.
Sources · tool facts checked November 2026
See more options in our guide to the best background jobs & workflows tools for startups.
Still not sure which to pick?
Get a free, AI-powered tech stack — including the best background jobs & workflows pick for your budget and team — in 60 seconds.