vs

Arcade vs Nango: Which is Better in 2026?

Agent Auth & Tool Calling

Choosing between Arcade and Nango? Both are popular agent auth & tool calling tools. Below we compare them on pricing, free tiers, features, and pros & cons so you can pick the right fit for your stack.

Quick verdict

Both are solid agent auth & tool calling options. Arcade is cheaper to start, but the right choice depends on the specific features and integrations you need.

Arcade vs Nango — Side by Side

ArcadeNango
CategoryAgent Auth & Tool CallingAgent Auth & Tool Calling
PricingFree · paid from $25/moFree · paid from $50/mo
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Free tier
Rating4.54.5
Best forAgent Auth & Tool Calling — mcp, tool-callingAgent Auth & Tool Calling — oauth, integrations

Pros & Cons

  • Per-call authorization scoped to user and agent
  • Policy hooks to block or redact without forking
  • Self-host in your VPC or air-gapped on Enterprise
  • Small free tier (2,000 tool calls)
  • Per-call fees add up for chatty agents
  • Self-hosting is Enterprise-only
  • 1,000+ APIs with managed OAuth
  • Syncs and webhooks as well as tool calls
  • Source on GitHub; free self-host for auth
  • Elastic License 2.0, not OSI open source
  • Free self-host excludes syncs, tool calls and MCP
  • Per-connection pricing grows with users

Key Features Compared

Arcade

  • $0.10 per authorization event
  • $0.01 per tool call
  • Next-business-day support

Nango

  • $0.29 per connection
  • $0.72 per compute hour
  • $0.50 per GB

Choose Arcade if…

  • You want a free tier to validate before paying.
  • Budget is tight — paid plans start lower ($25/mo vs $50/mo).
  • Per-call authorization scoped to user and agent
  • Policy hooks to block or redact without forking

Choose Nango if…

  • You want a free tier to validate before paying.
  • 1,000+ APIs with managed OAuth
  • Syncs and webhooks as well as tool calls
  • Source on GitHub; free self-host for auth

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Arcade better than Nango?⌄

Both are solid agent auth & tool calling options. Arcade is cheaper to start, but the right choice depends on the specific features and integrations you need.

What is the difference between Arcade and Nango?⌄

Arcade — MCP runtime that lets agents act as the signed-in user, with per-call authorization, policy hooks and 8,000+ permission-aware tools. Nango — Source-available integration platform: managed OAuth for 1,000+ APIs, tool calls and an MCP server, syncs and webhooks. Free self-host for auth and proxy. Both are agent auth & tool calling tools; the comparison table above breaks down pricing, free tiers, and what each is best for.

Arcade vs Nango: which is cheaper?⌄

Arcade pricing: Free · paid from $25/mo. Nango pricing: Free · paid from $50/mo. Confirm current pricing on each tool's official site, as plans change.

Which is rated higher, Arcade or Nango?⌄

In our catalog, Arcade rates 4.5 out of 5 and Nango rates 4.5 out of 5 — they are evenly matched.

See more options in our guide to the best agent auth & tool calling tools for startups.

In-depth guideComposio vs Arcade (2026): Agent Auth & Tool Calling, Plus Open-Source Nango and ACI.devYour agent has to act inside Gmail, Slack and Salesforce as each of your users, without the model seeing a token. Composio and Arcade compared with Nango and ACI.dev on OAuth handling, licence and cost at 50 and 1,000 users.

Still not sure which to pick?

Get a free, AI-powered tech stack — including the best agent auth & tool calling pick for your budget and team — in 60 seconds.

Build my stack free